By Johnny Franks, Warrior Editorial Fellow
In the intricate geopolitical arena that is the Red Sea, the U.S. finds itself in a critical position as it recalibrates its policy towards the Houthi insurgents and their belligerent attacks on commercial ships. A recent stern rebuke, articulated jointly by the U.S. and a coalition of 12 nations, highlights the growing possibility of American intervention targeting the Iranian-affiliated faction for its attacks on civilian maritime transport. This shift, in tandem with the U.S. call for expedited deliberations to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), telegraphs to the Houthis an escalated willingness to conduct offensive campaigns against them. This strategic pivot aims to enhance the protection of key maritime routes and maintain regional stability.
Still, amid the increasing tension, the prevailing strategic doctrine of the United States, exemplified by the initiative known as Operation Prosperity Guardian (OPG), is fundamentally preventive in nature. Vice Admiral Brad Cooper has underscored OPG’s mission to impede illicit undertakings and amplify the overarching deterrent posture while concurrently bolstering confidence within the maritime commercial sector. The operation has been marked by extensive international collaboration, safeguarding the transit of approximately 1500 merchant vessels through the Red Sea and an expanding network of national actors coalescing around its objectives. Yet, despite these concerted endeavors, the Houthi provocations persist, with 25 documented assaults post November 18th, underscoring the persistent and looming menace they represent. While not achieving the most desirable outcome, OPG has enhanced regional security and promoted largely unhindered navigation in the region, corroborated by testimonials from industry stakeholders. The operation’s strategy of implementing a “zone defense” and the bolstered presence of international maritime and aerial assets underscore the United States’ commitment to sustaining regional stability while eschewing exacerbation of the conflict.
Army 3 Star Details Innovation for Future War
Previously, The Biden administration has exhibited a reticence towards an outright militarized response to the Houthi provocations, potentially attributable to the intricate web of the Yemeni internecine conflict, the specter of regional conflagration, and the cascade of global repercussions. The administration’s stance appears to be one of circumspection, weighing the extensive strategic consequences while addressing the immediate perils posed by the Houthi insurgency.
While unmistakable indicators suggest that the United States is contemplating a transition towards a more assertive stance toward the Houthi threat in the Red Sea, such considerations are invariably juxtaposed against the extensive backdrop of regional composure, adherence to international law, and the inherent risks of escalation. The United States appears to be steering a course that synthesizes diplomatic pressure, the construction of international coalitions, and a robust defensive posture through OPG. This strategy is geared towards deterring Houthi aggressions while remaining acutely aware of the labyrinthine dynamics at play within the Yemeni theatre and the broader geopolitical landscape of the Middle East, underscoring the imperative for a multilateral resolution to this globally significant quandary.
Johnny Franks, Warrior Editorial Fellow, holds an MA From American University in Foreign Policy and National Security
