Germany Decides Not To Send Cutting Edge Taurus KEPD 350 Missile to Ukraine

Johnny Franks, Warrior Editorial Fellow

Could a leaked conversation over missile aid reveal the unseen pressures shaping the future of international conflicts? A recent audio leak revealed discussions among German military personnel about the potential provision of Taurus Cruise Missiles to Ukraine. Broadcasted by Russian state-controlled media, these discussions have publicly highlighted the technical assistance the German Air Force could offer in deploying these missiles. Specified targets for these missiles include the Kerch Bridge, a vital conduit linking Russia to the annexed Crimea and a critical supply route for Russian forces in Eastern Ukraine.

The Taurus KEPD 350 missile is distinguished as a precision-guided munition capable of reaching targets up to approximately 310 miles away, thanks to its integration of stealth technology to evade radar detection. This capability makes it particularly suitable for targeting complex infrastructures, such as durable structures like bridges. This technology allows the missile to distinguish between open air, solid structures, and different materials as it penetrates a target, ensuring the warhead detonates at the optimal point to maximize damage.

The Taurus employs a combination of GPS, inertial guidance, and terrain reference navigation to maintain accuracy, enabling it to follow a pre-programmed flight path with minimal deviation. This precision is further enhanced by the missile’s use of a sophisticated imaging infrared seeker in the terminal phase of flight, which allows for final adjustments to ensure accuracy against specific targets, even in environments where GPS signals may be degraded or jammed.

The debate over whether to supply Ukraine with Taurus missiles underscores the broader discussion on the extent of Western aid, with concerns like those voiced by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz regarding potential Russian escalation playing a key role. Western countries, notably the United States, UK, and France, have supplied Ukraine with cruise missiles of similar dimensions and weight, albeit with differences in fuse technology and range. The Taurus missile’s “void sensing and layer counting” fuse enhances its performance against multilayered or subterranean targets by protecting the MEPHISTO warhead fuse from interference. This feature makes the Taurus particularly adept at destroying complex strategic targets deep within enemy lines. Its stealth and evasive capabilities are vital for operations aimed at disrupting enemy movements and supply lines, avoiding provocations that could lead to direct confrontations with Russian forces.

Despite producing a significant number of these missiles, Germany has hesitated to supply them to Ukraine. As of early 2024, the German Bundestag and Chancellor Scholz have declined Ukraine’s requests for the missiles, citing concerns over escalation and the risk of technology falling into enemy hands. Germany’s cautious stance reflects apprehensions about potential escalation and the transfer of sensitive technologies that could be captured by Russian forces. If delivered, Taurus missiles would provide the Ukrainian military with significant strategic advantages, enabling precise and devastating strikes on Russian-held key positions and potentially altering the balance of power on the ground. The contemplation of such advanced weapons deliveries by the West marks a delicate balance between military support, geopolitical considerations, and the quest for a resolution to the conflict.

Johnny Franks holds an MA in U.S. Foreign Policy & National Security from American University and a BA in Diplomacy & World Affairs from Occidental College. With a specific interest in geopolitical security and military technology, Johnny has primarily focused his research and analysis on the Russia-Ukraine conflict from 2014 onwards. As part of his MA coursework, Johnny contributed to developing an Arctic defense strategy in partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense